Jump to content
The forums have been archived and are now read only. Years of great info saved for your reading pleasure. Thank you! Visit us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/NakedInvestor/ ×
The Naked Investor Forums
verbatim

Wow!

Recommended Posts

You have a home under contract that needs 5k in repairs and has a 5k lien on it. You require the lien to be paid by the buyer at closing. After some marketing you get 3 initial offers:

A. only $1500 profit [will pay lien]

B. $1500 up front and 1k a month for 4 months [will pay lien]

C. $4500 profit [tire kicker who wants you to pay the lien and be reimbursed by him]

 

 

B makes a verbal agreement, then when you try to sign a contract he doesn't return your calls. C just calls every few weeks with a lower price and no commitment. A is ALL ABOUT IT! And why not he's getting it at a great price.

 

You sign a contract with A and try to set a closing date, but she states she wants to pay the 5k lien as required by seller[you] and get the documents back from lien holder [which takes 3-4 weeks] before closing. 2 weeks after A pays the lien B calls asking if you are still going to close on the date he suggested, which is 2 weeks away.

 

As it is an extra 4k and you have a clause that can get you out of the contract with A, do you:

 

1. Sell to B and reimburse A the 5k + maybe $500-1000 for 4 weeks wasted

2. Sell to B and reimburse A the 5k + nothing

3. Sell to A since he signed a contract 1st even though you have a clause to cancel.

4. Other

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd opt for door number 3, sell to buyer A. It's the old "bird in the hand" mindset I have a tendency to follow. The fact that buyer B disappeared for a few weeks doesn't give me a warm, fuzzy feel. Plus, none of these deals is oozing money, so I would opt for the seemingly more serious buyer, put the bucks in my pocket, be done with it and move on to bigger and better things.

My two cents. . .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'd opt for door number 3, sell to buyer A. It's the old "bird in the hand" mindset I have a tendency to follow. The fact that buyer B disappeared for a few weeks doesn't give me a warm, fuzzy feel. Plus, none of these deals is oozing money, so I would opt for the seemingly more serious buyer, put the bucks in my pocket, be done with it and move on to bigger and better things.

My two cents. . .

 

I agree 100% Mike. The fact that buyer A was able to push the button while others kicked rocks was impressive as that is the type of investor I want to work with. It would make no sense to burn that bridge. the other buyers didnt give me a good feeling either. My gut told me to be honorable and do the right thing, but as I am new to r.e.i. I had to ask. For all I know it could be common place for some of the investors I respect on this and other forums to rip up contracts daily over situations like this. I was just checking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...