On Friday night I went to a very nice wedding reception. One of my best friends from college was there and it was fun to catch up. He no longer lives in town so I only see him maybe 2-3 times per yr. I know that he invests in RE and also know that he owns a property in an area here that is known to be very bad. The last time I spoke to him it was vacant and had been for some time.
On Saturday night I asked him again, "so do you still have that house in the war zone?" and I get this as an answer, "well sort of, sort of not." It turns out that the city decided to tear it down
The house was boarded up and it had been that way for quite some time because he had fixed it up 3 times and finally decided he was tired of a) no tenants, b.) no buyers, c) people breaking windows, d) people stealing the appliances/copper pipes, e) finding evidence of squatters etc etc. I guess one time about 2 yrs ago he had someone all lined up to buy and at the final inspection there was a drive by shooting right down the street as the prospective buyer was on the inspection. I guess they were not real fond of that and the deal fell through.
I'm sure there are more mistakes in this one than what I can think of, but here are some of the obvious ones:
1) Don't buy in a war zone.
2) Don't be an out of town buyer.
3) Don't use your own money for downpayment etc. (If he would have done a CA or an SLO none of this would be his problem)
Alan