With this deal the seller is a banker and the tenant/buyer is a VP at a branch bank so the qualifying on both sides of this deal has been interesting to say the least.
Things where set and the t/b back out, as her FHA contact at her bank said that the "Title" of the agreements did not meet the FHA guide lines. It should read "Rent with Option to Purchase."
So, I notified the seller and with the seller being a banker too. She contacted her FHA folks upstairs. There reply was:
"I just spoke to my contact upstairs. I explained to her the issue of 2 separate agreements. She indicated FHA wouldn't care if there were 2 agreements, because once the option to purchase was exercised, the lease agreement is null and void. I told her I thought we were signing both agreements at the same time, would that make a difference? She said in her experience that has never been an issue with FHA. It is a lease agreement which is replaced at the end with an option to purchase. Again, the lease agreement is null."
So who knows?
This was just a great little deal. It is one of those properties that everyone is interested in and you can knock out in a couple of weeks. And what was great is that the tenant/buyer had FHA financing in place about ready to go. Damn.